3 ms·
Yes, due to the $220 million advertising spend scandal and her claims about it.
by Aurornis 8mo ago
Yes, due to the $220 million advertising spend scandal and her claims about it.
- decafninja 8mo agoBecause she blamed it on Trump. Had she not blamed Trump, he would have likely protected her.
- unethical_ban 8mo agoShe should have been tied to a wooden post and shipped out of DC on an uncovered railcar for labelling a peaceful protester assassinated by ICE a "domestic terrorist". Her scandal was not being subtle enough with the theft of government funds for Trump's taste, and he found a way to get rid of her that he could claim he had no part in.
- whattheheckheck 8mo agoI dont see the us empire recovering. This is in the starting / middle of a collapse. If any additional crises pop up inconjunction to this we are going to fall like the bronze age collapse
- red-iron-pine 8mo agorailcar? is that a metaphor? she should be tried for corruption and manslaughter.
- unethical_ban 8mo agoIt's a reference to the saying "run out of town on a rail"