4 ms·
Glacier looks great, until you look at the retrieval costs! If you use it as a backup strategy and you're going to need access to all of your data then you're
by pja 14y ago
Glacier looks great, until you look at the retrieval costs!
If you use it as a backup strategy and you're going to need access to all of your data then you're going to have to extract it from glacier in a relatively short time period. This might cost you an arm and a leg (relative to the storage costs)!
See: http://brandt.github.com/amazon-glacier-calc/ http://brandt.github.com/amazon-glacier-calc/ for an online calculator.
If your use case matches the price structure in that most of your data is write and forget and occasionally you'll need a small piece of it back then it's a fantastic service & as last-ditch backup options go it's a whole lot better than nothing at all!
(edit: not sure that calculator is entirely useful since it appears to squeeze the entire download into a single 4 hour period.)
- luser001 14y agoThat calculator seems incorrect to me. In particular the assumption that "Retrieval time is how long it takes Amazon to fulfull your request. Retrieval time has nothing to do with your download speed." seems to be the root cause. Plugging in numbers from Amazon's worked example from https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/faqs/#How_much_data_can_I_retrieve_for_free https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/faqs/#How_much_data_can_I_ret... gives different numbers than that web page. My estimate for downloading 1 TB continuously for 1 MB/sec is a retrieval fee of approx $25 in addition to data transfer fees.