4 ms·
It seems almost impossible. I spent the weekend comparing nanoclaw to openclaw - nanoclaw is a slightly more secure version - containerized filesystem basicall
by vessenes 7mo ago
It seems almost impossible. I spent the weekend comparing nanoclaw to openclaw - nanoclaw is a slightly more secure version - containerized filesystem basically - and very popular.
It's a) harder to setup, b) less functional out of the box, c) has almost exactly the same security risk surface -- either you hook it up to your email, comms, documents and give it API tokens, or you don't. If you do -- well, at least it can't delete your hard drive without turning full evil and looking for red pill type exploits that break the container -- but, it still has the same other security dynamics.
Anyway, employing a very suspicious watcher that's hooked to the shell and API calls is probably the way forward. Can that thing be reasoned with / tricked?
- Tylast 7mo agoI'm on my 3rd "claw" variant (currently https://github.com/moltis-org/moltis https://github.com/moltis-org/moltis). I had the same issues you had. Moltis is better (at the moment).