3 ms·

>with no evidence Nick Shirley and other indie journalists did investigations and found you can easily fraud election in places with no voter ID like Cali. But

>with no evidence Nick Shirley and other indie journalists did investigations and found you can easily fraud election in places with no voter ID like Cali. But don't let distracted by the facts. >BLM was individuals responding to seeing, _with their own eyes_, power being blatantly abused _by government officials_, live on TV, many, many times. Yeah, all those innocent businesses and property deserved to get looted and torched because a cop killed a guy breaking the law high on fentanyl. It's totally acceptable and tolerant. If something from the government bothers you, you are now legally and socially allowed just rob a Nike store and brn down some cars in the city center.

kgwxd 7mo ago
Nick Shirley and other "indie journalists" doing "investigations", is very far from "fact". And nowhere near justification for attempting to overthrow a government. Curious though, did they "find that out" by doing it end-to-end? Pseudo-intellectual "deductive reasoning" does not actually prove anything, other than the bad-faith nature of the person presenting it as evidence. Didn't say any of that should be legal. Anyone arrested for that deserved it. And anyone pardoned, should not have been. Do you agree? If Biden had told those people directly that he loved them, and they should keep up the good work, I'd be on here objecting to it just as much.
- joe_mamba 7mo ago
  >Anyone arrested for that deserved it. And anyone pardoned, should not have been. Do you agree? Agree butt... >attempting to overthrow a government. J6 Storming the capital is not the same thing as overthrowing a government. It's more like cosplaying to overthrow the government while the actual government watches and laughs. You can't overthrow any government until you have the full support of the military. Why can't democrat supporters see and analyze anything else happening in their back ayrd besides being forever stuck on J6? Everyone agrees it was bad, now can we move on to the present issues at hand? >"deductive reasoning" does not actually prove anything Deductive reasoning is everything. If there's loopholes that allow crimes to happen in theory, then crimes will 100% happen in practice. Do you agree? Pretending it's not actual evidence, is how criminals(and governments) get away with crime, because they never investigate those issue, when their exploitation benefits them. Same like with the Minnesota somali childcare fraud. Isn't it convenient that we can't consider it fraud until the government investigates itself and it rarely does and when it does it finds nothing because they're in cahoots with the scammers as they all get kickbacks?
  - kgwxd 7mo ago
    You obviously left out pseudo-intellectual part on purpose. Actual deductive reasoning has it's place. It's most certainly not "everything". It sure as hell isn't how law works. The 1 loophole every single law has is they can't physically stop people from committing the crime, so they can always still happen. There's a ton of laws anyone can break with something as simple as a pencil, you can't use that "fact" to justify ANYTHING, let alone J6.
    - joe_mamba 7mo ago
      >You obviously left out pseudo-intellectual part on purpose. I didn't want to insult you. Everyone with two neurons to rub together can recognize when a scam (election fraud, childcare fraud, etc) is happening right in front of them because they see the conditions for something to happen are all there. The midwit pseudo intellectuals are the ones refusing to acknowledge the common sense pattern recognition logic that exposes scams, and instead rejects them on ideological grounds and only bases their judgement on asking for proof coming from the corrupt sources of authority that are in on the scams or too incompetent and short staffed to check. >you can't use that "fact" to justify ANYTHING, let alone J6. Where did I justify that?

kgwxd 7mo ago

Nick Shirley and other "indie journalists" doing "investigations", is very far from "fact". And nowhere near justification for attempting to overthrow a government. Curious though, did they "find that out" by doing it end-to-end? Pseudo-intellectual "deductive reasoning" does not actually prove anything, other than the bad-faith nature of the person presenting it as evidence. Didn't say any of that should be legal. Anyone arrested for that deserved it. And anyone pardoned, should not have been. Do you agree? If Biden had told those people directly that he loved them, and they should keep up the good work, I'd be on here objecting to it just as much.

joe_mamba 7mo ago
>Anyone arrested for that deserved it. And anyone pardoned, should not have been. Do you agree? Agree butt... >attempting to overthrow a government. J6 Storming the capital is not the same thing as overthrowing a government. It's more like cosplaying to overthrow the government while the actual government watches and laughs. You can't overthrow any government until you have the full support of the military. Why can't democrat supporters see and analyze anything else happening in their back ayrd besides being forever stuck on J6? Everyone agrees it was bad, now can we move on to the present issues at hand? >"deductive reasoning" does not actually prove anything Deductive reasoning is everything. If there's loopholes that allow crimes to happen in theory, then crimes will 100% happen in practice. Do you agree? Pretending it's not actual evidence, is how criminals(and governments) get away with crime, because they never investigate those issue, when their exploitation benefits them. Same like with the Minnesota somali childcare fraud. Isn't it convenient that we can't consider it fraud until the government investigates itself and it rarely does and when it does it finds nothing because they're in cahoots with the scammers as they all get kickbacks?
- kgwxd 7mo ago
  You obviously left out pseudo-intellectual part on purpose. Actual deductive reasoning has it's place. It's most certainly not "everything". It sure as hell isn't how law works. The 1 loophole every single law has is they can't physically stop people from committing the crime, so they can always still happen. There's a ton of laws anyone can break with something as simple as a pencil, you can't use that "fact" to justify ANYTHING, let alone J6.
  - joe_mamba 7mo ago
    >You obviously left out pseudo-intellectual part on purpose. I didn't want to insult you. Everyone with two neurons to rub together can recognize when a scam (election fraud, childcare fraud, etc) is happening right in front of them because they see the conditions for something to happen are all there. The midwit pseudo intellectuals are the ones refusing to acknowledge the common sense pattern recognition logic that exposes scams, and instead rejects them on ideological grounds and only bases their judgement on asking for proof coming from the corrupt sources of authority that are in on the scams or too incompetent and short staffed to check. >you can't use that "fact" to justify ANYTHING, let alone J6. Where did I justify that?