2 ms·

First, it's very unlikely all people will become aware of it. Our culture has made it taboo to even think in this direction. Second, nothing will change. Peopl

First, it's very unlikely all people will become aware of it. Our culture has made it taboo to even think in this direction. Second, nothing will change. People will still behave based off of their instincts and underlying biology. Awareness of the underlying biology doesn't change anything. Men are very much always attracted to young women with nice curves even though they are well aware that this attraction is just an irrational biological instinct. Awareness does not change behavior, therefore, society will not collapse.

anal_reactor 7mo ago
Not necessarily. IMO the current demographic collapse can be mostly explained by people asking themselves whether they want children rather than just blindly putting penis into vagina.
- threethirtytwo 7mo ago
  No part of population growth was addiction to sex. Even people who didn’t want children would have children simply by wanting to fuck. That changed with birth control. People still blindly put penises into vaginas and now more than ever women are blindly letting in more and more penises when in the past they were much more guarded.
  - anal_reactor 7mo ago
    > No part of population growth was addiction to sex. Bold claim.
    - threethirtytwo 7mo ago
      I mean that generally. We have sex for pleasure and for many it’s hard to abstain forever. I’m not referring to sex addiction as a chronic disease.
      - anal_reactor 7mo ago
        Yes. And sex results in babies. I cannot link to any resources backing that claim so you'll have to just trust me here.
        threethirtytwo 7mo ago
        [flagged]
        mschuster91 7mo ago
        > Eliminate the side effect via birth control and people can now have sex for pleasure with no side effects. And that's not a bad thing. People used to have babies even if they were nowhere near ready for it by age, emotionally, financially or in terms of housing. Particularly teen pregnancies have a massive cost on society and reinforce generational poverty. If governments would actually want more children, they'd lower the working hours so that both parents can stay employed while being actually able to raise their children adequately (no, handing off your kids at 7 in the morning and getting them back at 6 in the evening, only to have maybe an hour of actual time with them before they have to sleep is not raising children adequately), they'd provide families with housing, they'd provide mothers with affordable healthcare instead of five figures worth of hospital bills in the US, they'd provide both parents with parental leave instead of forcing them to juggle work and adjusting to care for a toddler... Young people everywhere see how unimportant they are to society and are resisting to fall into the same trap their parents did.

anal_reactor 7mo ago

Not necessarily. IMO the current demographic collapse can be mostly explained by people asking themselves whether they want children rather than just blindly putting penis into vagina.

threethirtytwo 7mo ago
No part of population growth was addiction to sex. Even people who didn’t want children would have children simply by wanting to fuck. That changed with birth control. People still blindly put penises into vaginas and now more than ever women are blindly letting in more and more penises when in the past they were much more guarded.
- anal_reactor 7mo ago
  > No part of population growth was addiction to sex. Bold claim.
  - threethirtytwo 7mo ago
    I mean that generally. We have sex for pleasure and for many it’s hard to abstain forever. I’m not referring to sex addiction as a chronic disease.
    - anal_reactor 7mo ago
      Yes. And sex results in babies. I cannot link to any resources backing that claim so you'll have to just trust me here.
      - threethirtytwo 7mo ago
        [flagged]
        mschuster91 7mo ago
        > Eliminate the side effect via birth control and people can now have sex for pleasure with no side effects. And that's not a bad thing. People used to have babies even if they were nowhere near ready for it by age, emotionally, financially or in terms of housing. Particularly teen pregnancies have a massive cost on society and reinforce generational poverty. If governments would actually want more children, they'd lower the working hours so that both parents can stay employed while being actually able to raise their children adequately (no, handing off your kids at 7 in the morning and getting them back at 6 in the evening, only to have maybe an hour of actual time with them before they have to sleep is not raising children adequately), they'd provide families with housing, they'd provide mothers with affordable healthcare instead of five figures worth of hospital bills in the US, they'd provide both parents with parental leave instead of forcing them to juggle work and adjusting to care for a toddler... Young people everywhere see how unimportant they are to society and are resisting to fall into the same trap their parents did.