4 ms·

Nah sorry, so far 4 of the 9 commit messages in that fork are "cleanup". And the first two commits are "new fork" and "fork", where "new fork" is a nice (+2820

by jcattle 7mo ago

Nah sorry, so far 4 of the 9 commit messages in that fork are "cleanup". And the first two commits are "new fork" and "fork", where "new fork" is a nice (+28204 -39206) commit and "fork" is a cheeky (+23971 -23921) commit. I think I'm good. And I would question the judgement of anyone jumping on this fork.

emil-lp 7mo ago
Commit messages say a lot about people.
- jcattle 7mo ago
  They really do. Let me cite another one from the repo: "fix: updated readme. sorry was so tired i accidentally mass replaced uv with fyn for all"
- nikolay 7mo ago
  Branch names do, too!
bjornarv 7mo ago
creator is definitely just jumping on this for some clout
deleted 7mo ago
[deleted]
albinn 7mo ago
I agree, I like some of the directions the fork would go and dislike some. The apparent, fork, publish on HN, then change (and the change showing not a lot of understanding) makes me throughly question the legitimacy and long term stability of it.
- dec0dedab0de 7mo ago
  absolutely, but i like the spirit behind it. Hopefully we get a few more and one of them pulls ahead.
ricardobeat 7mo ago
based on that, the project description is entirely a lie - there are no bugfixes, new features, or even the removed telemetry here ?