3 ms·

Well then clearly you haven't taken a look at https://status.claude.com https://status.claude.com.

bombcar 7mo ago
This is ... surprisingly honest? The one above is "missing" status page; and most status pages would legally have to be filed in the "fiction" section of the library.
dathinab 7mo ago
At that 3rd party side GH is currently noticeable worse then claude ... Like they are down to one 9 availability and very very close to losing that to (90.2x%). This also fit more closely to my personal experience, then the 99.900-99.989 range the article indicates... Through honestly 99.9% means 8.76h downtime a year, if we say no more then 20min down time per 3 hours (sliding window), and no more then 1h a day, and >50% downtime being (localized) off-working hours (e.g. night, Sat,Sun) then 99.9% is something you can work with. Sure it would sometimes be slightly annoying. But should not cause any real issues. On the other hand 90.21%... That is 35.73h outage a year. Probably still fine if for each location the working hour availability is 99.95% and the previous constraints are there. But uh, wtf. that just isn't right for a company of that size.
- kbelder 7mo ago
  You may have fumbled the calculator at one point. 20Min per 3 hours is 88.8% uptime. 99.9% uptime is 11 seconds down.
  - dathinab 7mo ago
    what I meant is having both at the same time - at most 20min per 3 hour - and 99.9% uptime on a yearly basis as in your yearly budged of outage is ~8.76h but that budged shouldn't happen all at once and if there is an outage it at most delays works by 20min at a time, and not directly again after you had a downtime but I did fumble the 90.21% part, which is ~35.73 days i.e. over 857 hours....
- zahlman 7mo ago
  > On the other hand 90.21%... That is 35.73h outage a year. Days, not hours.
ctmnt 7mo ago
I get the email notifications from Anthropic’s status monitor, and I think they might be my most frequent emailer these days.

This is ... surprisingly honest? The one above is "missing" status page; and most status pages would legally have to be filed in the "fiction" section of the library.

dathinab 7mo ago

At that 3rd party side GH is currently noticeable worse then claude ... Like they are down to one 9 availability and very very close to losing that to (90.2x%). This also fit more closely to my personal experience, then the 99.900-99.989 range the article indicates... Through honestly 99.9% means 8.76h downtime a year, if we say no more then 20min down time per 3 hours (sliding window), and no more then 1h a day, and >50% downtime being (localized) off-working hours (e.g. night, Sat,Sun) then 99.9% is something you can work with. Sure it would sometimes be slightly annoying. But should not cause any real issues. On the other hand 90.21%... That is 35.73h outage a year. Probably still fine if for each location the working hour availability is 99.95% and the previous constraints are there. But uh, wtf. that just isn't right for a company of that size.

kbelder 7mo ago
You may have fumbled the calculator at one point. 20Min per 3 hours is 88.8% uptime. 99.9% uptime is 11 seconds down.
- dathinab 7mo ago
  what I meant is having both at the same time - at most 20min per 3 hour - and 99.9% uptime on a yearly basis as in your yearly budged of outage is ~8.76h but that budged shouldn't happen all at once and if there is an outage it at most delays works by 20min at a time, and not directly again after you had a downtime but I did fumble the 90.21% part, which is ~35.73 days i.e. over 857 hours....
zahlman 7mo ago
> On the other hand 90.21%... That is 35.73h outage a year. Days, not hours.

ctmnt 7mo ago

I get the email notifications from Anthropic’s status monitor, and I think they might be my most frequent emailer these days.