> Lattner found nothing innovative in the code generated by AI [1]. In theory, we are just one good innovation away from changing this. In reality, it's probab

> Lattner found nothing innovative in the code generated by AI [1]. In theory, we are just one good innovation away from changing this. In reality, it's probably still some years away, but we are not in a situation where have to seriously speculate with this possibility. > And this is why humans will be needed to advance the state of the art. But we only need a minority for innovations, progress and control. The bulk of IT is boring repetitive slop, lacking any innovation and just following patterns. The endgame will still result in probably 99% of humans being useless for the machinery. And this is not really new. In any industry, the majority of workers are just average, without any real influence on their industries progress, and just following conventional wisdom to make some bucks for surviving the next day.