4 ms·
As of recently (workflows worked for months) I even have part of my CI on actions that fails with [0] 2026-02-27T10:11:51.1425380Z ##[error]The runner has rece
by Eikon 7mo ago
As of recently (workflows worked for months) I even have part of my CI on actions that fails with [0]
2026-02-27T10:11:51.1425380Z ##[error]The runner has received a shutdown signal. This can happen when the runner service is stopped, or a manually started runner is canceled.
2026-02-27T10:11:56.2331271Z ##[error]The operation was canceled.
I had to disable the workflows.
GitHub support response has been
“ We recommend reviewing the specific job step this occurs at to identify any areas where you can lessen parallel operations and CPU/memory consumption at one time.”
That plus other various issues makes me start to think about alternatives, and it would have never occurred to me one year back.
[0] https://github.com/Barre/ZeroFS/actions/runs/22480743922/job/65120241358?pr=357 https://github.com/Barre/ZeroFS/actions/runs/22480743922/job...
- PxldLtd 7mo agoWe've jumped ship to self-hosted Jenkins. Woodpecker CI looks cool but Jenkins seemed like a safer bet for us. It's been well worth the effort and it's simplified and sped up our CI massively. Once we got the email that they were going to charge for self-hosted runners that was the final nail in the coffin for us. They walked it back but we've lost faith entirely in the platform and vision.
- thwarted 7mo agoCharging for self-hosted runners is like a corkage fee but you still need to open the bottle yourself.
- hrmtst93837 7mo ago[flagged]
- maccard 7mo agoI don’t know what’s worse - in 2026 someone genuinely suggesting Jenkins as a viable GHA alternative, or me agreeing with that. Jenkins has possibly the worst user experience of any piece of software I’ve had to use in the last few years. It’s slow, brittle, somehow both heavyweight and has no features, littered with security vulns due to architecture, is impossible to navigate, has absolutely no standardisation for usage. And yet it’s still more reliable than GHA.
- PxldLtd 6mo agoYep, I went through the exact same pains. We desperately wanted to move to something else and I kept steering us away from Jenkins as I'd experienced its pains at a previous role. We evaluated tons of different options and begrudgingly settled on Jenkins too.
- maccard 6mo agoI think TeamCity is a better product, and I’d be happy to pay for it tbh!
- hrmtst93837 7mo ago[flagged]
- PxldLtd 6mo agoCI is basically a glorified shell script executor with some env variable/credential injection. We don't use many of the plugins aside from the docker and the agent shell one. I'm not sure I'm sold on this argument considering the docker image for GH Actions is made by "myoung34" and half the actions are community written, have terrible documentation and feel like abandonware too.