3 ms·
You won't find anything innovative in most human-written compilers either, so by that argument we can't advance the state of the set either.
by vidarh 7mo ago
You won't find anything innovative in most human-written compilers either, so by that argument we can't advance the state of the set either.
- steve_adams_86 7mo agoWe created compilers in the first place. I suppose an interesting question is: would LLMs have come up with compilers if humans hadn't?
- vidarh 7mo ago"We", yes, but my point is that most people who write compilers do nothing but implement known techniques. If you then judge human ability to innovate by investigating a single compiler for innovation, odds are you would get the entirely wrong idea of what we are capable of.