23 ms·

You're counting across the dateline, so for you it was 11/5.

• clebio 14y ago
  Am I? Not snark: if I'm misunderstanding this, I truly want to know. I'm in central US, CST, and the article gives PST. That conversion has always just been +2 hours.
  • Cushman 14y ago
    As I read it that was 18:24 yesterday in PST, or 02:24 today in UTC. The use of "today" may just be sloppy dating-- or it may reflect that it was today for most of those affected.
    • clebio 14y ago
      My guess was that he wrote the article yesterday, but didn't publish it until today. It's not a big deal, was just curious.
      • eastdakota 14y ago
        That's correct. Tom wrote the article yesterday (11/5) but I didn't review it and hit publish until today (11/6). Sorry for the confusion.