4 ms·

> It's extremely rare that you need to (printf "%d %d" foo) I write stuff like `map (printf "%d %d" m) ns` all the time. I daresay I even do the map as a parti

• gf000 7mo ago
  But arguably your intent would be much more clear with something like `map (printf "%d %d" m _) ns` or a lambda. I don't think parent is saying that partial application is bad, far from it. But to a reader it is valuable information whether it's partial or full application.
  • octachron 7mo ago
    Not really when reading `iter (printf %"d %d" m) ns`, I am likely to read it in three steps - `iter`: this is a side-effect on a collection - `(printf`: ok, this is just printing, I don't care about what is printed, let's skip to the `)` - ns: ok, this is the collection being printed Notice that having a lambda or a partial application `_` will only add noise here. > But to a reader it is valuable information whether it's partial or full application. This can be a valuable information in some context, but in a functional language, functions are values. Thus a "partial application" (in term of closure construction) might be better read as a full application because the main type of concern in the current context is a functional type.