4 ms·
I didn't dismiss the language. I called it a north star. Rust is still the best option if you desire memory safety. But rewriting a complex working piece of so
by adsharma 7mo ago
I didn't dismiss the language. I called it a north star. Rust is still the best option if you desire memory safety.
But rewriting a complex working piece of software in Rust is not trivial. Having an incremental path (where only parts are rewritten in Rust and compatible with C++ code) would be a good path to get there.
Also open to new code and extensions getting written in Rust.