4 ms·
OK so why wasn't this implemented in the first place? For that matter, why does our reinvented wheel have fundamental limitations?
by MarsIronPI 7mo ago
OK so why wasn't this implemented in the first place? For that matter, why does our reinvented wheel have fundamental limitations?
- seba_dos1 7mo agoIt's not a core protocol's concern and the fact that it's being successfully implemented proves that there are no fundamental limitations there. I'm not happy with how the collaboration and planning between various parties involved went over years and I do believe that a lot of these adoption pains are fully self-inflicted, but that has absolutely nothing to do with Wayland's technical design.
- incrudible 7mo agoYou can’t effectively dismiss a critique of something missing from the core protocol by declaring it to not be its concern.
- seba_dos1 7mo agoI can, I just did. It's just not a thing that should be there at all, and it's obvious once you take a second to look at what's actually in it and why (spoiler: there's too much in it and not much can be done about it now).
- Brian_K_White 7mo agoYou did not. You dismissed something, but not effectively.
- braiamp 7mo agoWhy should a display manager concern itself with routing keystrokes to every application.
- MarsIronPI 7mo agoWhy should a display manager also have to implement window management? (I know this is a separate complaint, but I still think it's a valid one.)