I have a weird hobby: about once a year I go to the theory page [0] in pijul manual and see if they have fixed the TeX formatting yet. You would think that if

I have a weird hobby: about once a year I go to the theory page [0] in pijul manual and see if they have fixed the TeX formatting yet. You would think that if a better, more sound model of storing patches is your whole selling point, you would want to make as easy as possible for people who are interested in the project to actually understand it. It is really weird not to care about the first impression that your manual makes on a curious reader. Currently, I'm about 6 years into the experiment. Approximately 2 years in (about 4 years ago), I've actually went to the Pijul Nest and reported [1] the issue. I got an explanation on fixing this issue locally, but weirly enough, the fix still wasn't actually implemented on the public version. I'll report back in about a year with an update on the experiment. [0] https://pijul.org/manual/theory.html https://pijul.org/manual/theory.html [1] https://nest.pijul.com/pijul/manual/discussions/46 https://nest.pijul.com/pijul/manual/discussions/46