4 ms·
Not convinced of that edit - or at least, my read was "revisit this 5 years from now", not 30...
by eichin 7mo ago
Not convinced of that edit - or at least, my read was "revisit this 5 years from now", not 30...
- ProllyInfamous 7mo agoThe edit was perhaps personal... actuarily, three decades is what I'd be given =D Now that I'm revisiting these comments, thanks for pointing out that 30 - 25 == five years into the future [honestly, I hadn't even given this any thought...] 1999 was ten years ago, right.!?