3 ms·

Given they are retroactively tampering with past archives it's not exactly trustworhy in the first place

• JasonADrury 7mo ago
  [flagged]
  • colejohnson66 7mo ago
    Content. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-archive-today-after-site-executed-ddos-and-altered-web-captures/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-a...
• vachina 7mo ago
  Proof?
  • Hamuko 7mo ago
    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-archive-today-after-site-executed-ddos-and-altered-web-captures/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-a...
    • flexagoon 7mo ago
      That doesn't say anything about them tapering with archive content
      • frenchtoast8 7mo ago
        Yes it does. The last section of the article. https://megalodon.jp/2026-0219-1634-10/https://archive.ph:443/LZymb https://megalodon.jp/2026-0219-1634-10/https://archive.ph:44... This is an archive of an Archive.is archive of a blog post. The first sentence of the post says “ Jani Patokallio was a woman of exceptional intellect…” This was changed, it originally had someone else’s name (see second paragraph). So, who knows what other archived pages were changed?