3 ms·

Because all the content in the past 4+ years is about archive.today?

winkelmann 7mo ago
> all the content in the past 4+ years is about archive.today But it's not? This was published between the two posts about archive.today: https://gyrovague.com/2025/02/23/anatomy-of-a-boarding-pass-how-to-detect-fake-flight-tickets-by-scammers/ https://gyrovague.com/2025/02/23/anatomy-of-a-boarding-pass-...
- JasonADrury 7mo ago
  Okay, there's one filler post I missed. I'm sure it took a lot of time to write the 16739382nd post explaining what the various things on a boarding pass mean.
  - ahhhhnoooo 7mo ago
    They have posted twice in four years. Once doing some digging into who runs archive today, and a second time to respond to a ddos attack. Writing about being ddos'd seems eminently reasonable. So if you elide that, you are talking about a single article in four years. It's genuinely nothing.
    - deleted 7mo ago
      [deleted]
    - JasonADrury 7mo ago
      The purpose of a thing is what it does.
      - throwingcookies 7mo ago
        > The purpose of a thing is what it does. What is the purpose of the DDoS JS in the archive website then? Not DDoS?
        JasonADrury 7mo ago
        I'm sure it's DDoS, just like the purpose of gyrovague.com is to attack archive.today Easy stuff, no?
        ahhhhnoooo 7mo ago
        Attack? Did we read the same one article? One article is clearly defensive. The other is a piece of investigative journalism about who and how the site is run. Neither of those is an attack.
        JasonADrury 7mo ago
        Of course attempting to dox someone is an attack.
        throwingcookies 7mo ago
        > Of course attempting to dox someone is an attack. That's not how the judicative system works.
        ahhhhnoooo 6mo ago
        That might be true! But I don't think anyone in this story did that.
Mogzol 7mo ago
Not true: https://gyrovague.com/2025/02/23/anatomy-of-a-boarding-pass-how-to-detect-fake-flight-tickets-by-scammers/ https://gyrovague.com/2025/02/23/anatomy-of-a-boarding-pass-... There are only two posts about archive.today on the blog, and one of them only exists because archive.today started DDoSing them. I fail to see how you could consider the entire blog to be a "harassment campaign", especially considering that the original blog post isn't even negative, it ends with a compliment towards archive.today's creator.
deleted 7mo ago
[deleted]
jrflowers 7mo ago
This is a weird way of saying that you wish gyrovague updated more frequently. You could just say “Big fan of his writing, I’d love it if he posted more” if your only complaint is that there aren’t enough recent blog posts on that website

> all the content in the past 4+ years is about archive.today But it's not? This was published between the two posts about archive.today: https://gyrovague.com/2025/02/23/anatomy-of-a-boarding-pass-how-to-detect-fake-flight-tickets-by-scammers/ https://gyrovague.com/2025/02/23/anatomy-of-a-boarding-pass-...

JasonADrury 7mo ago
Okay, there's one filler post I missed. I'm sure it took a lot of time to write the 16739382nd post explaining what the various things on a boarding pass mean.
- ahhhhnoooo 7mo ago
  They have posted twice in four years. Once doing some digging into who runs archive today, and a second time to respond to a ddos attack. Writing about being ddos'd seems eminently reasonable. So if you elide that, you are talking about a single article in four years. It's genuinely nothing.
  - deleted 7mo ago
    [deleted]
  - JasonADrury 7mo ago
    The purpose of a thing is what it does.
    - throwingcookies 7mo ago
      > The purpose of a thing is what it does. What is the purpose of the DDoS JS in the archive website then? Not DDoS?
      - JasonADrury 7mo ago
        I'm sure it's DDoS, just like the purpose of gyrovague.com is to attack archive.today Easy stuff, no?
        ahhhhnoooo 7mo ago
        Attack? Did we read the same one article? One article is clearly defensive. The other is a piece of investigative journalism about who and how the site is run. Neither of those is an attack.
        JasonADrury 7mo ago
        Of course attempting to dox someone is an attack.
        throwingcookies 7mo ago
        > Of course attempting to dox someone is an attack. That's not how the judicative system works.
        ahhhhnoooo 6mo ago
        That might be true! But I don't think anyone in this story did that.

Mogzol 7mo ago

Not true: https://gyrovague.com/2025/02/23/anatomy-of-a-boarding-pass-how-to-detect-fake-flight-tickets-by-scammers/ https://gyrovague.com/2025/02/23/anatomy-of-a-boarding-pass-... There are only two posts about archive.today on the blog, and one of them only exists because archive.today started DDoSing them. I fail to see how you could consider the entire blog to be a "harassment campaign", especially considering that the original blog post isn't even negative, it ends with a compliment towards archive.today's creator.

deleted 7mo ago

[deleted]

jrflowers 7mo ago

This is a weird way of saying that you wish gyrovague updated more frequently. You could just say “Big fan of his writing, I’d love it if he posted more” if your only complaint is that there aren’t enough recent blog posts on that website