2 ms·
Well clearly there is use for these - how do you distinguish what you are accessing in smart-pointer-like types.
by garaetjjte 7mo ago
Well clearly there is use for these - how do you distinguish what you are accessing in smart-pointer-like types.
- WalterBright 7mo agoYou'd still use the "." operator. Value, reference, or smart pointer use the same syntax. This means you can refactor them easily.