4 ms·
Evolution is questionable science. i am not trying to be contrarian. it's not dogma nor it is established, scientifically proved theory. Proponents, usually whe
by eager_learner 7mo ago
Evolution is questionable science. i am not trying to be contrarian. it's not dogma nor it is established, scientifically proved theory. Proponents, usually when cornered, shrug and say: 'well, this is the best explanation we have so far'. That's not science. Best possible scenario is speculation by a group of people with mediocre thinking skills.
Mentioning this here because just like your comment, this 'theory' is usually slid inside arguments to make it appear as established science or fact. Kinda like this AI debacle.
- HarHarVeryFunny 7mo agoThe "theory" of evolution" stopped being a theory when DNA was discovered and it's role understood. Now it's just the inevitable fact of evolution.
- eager_learner 7mo agoif that's true and evolutionists are so confident then why did my comment get downvoted so much? Knowledge from DNA disproved EVolution-- maybe you should read more. Here's one: 'Philosophical Scientists'-- David Foster, OUP
- HarHarVeryFunny 6mo agoIf someone wrote a book claiming to have a "mathematical proof" that "1 + 1 = 3", and put a picture of god on the cover, would you buy it and promote it?
- guzfip 6mo agoI guarantee you an LLM has already fooled him in this manner lmao
- eager_learner 6mo agoi don't know how old you are, but this does not seem like a mature, thinking person's behavior.
- eager_learner 6mo agoYou know, you should definitely keep writing comments like the one you just did, because it will show the thinking, intelligent readers what kind of people support Evolution theory... Thanks, I guess? The book you disparaged is written by a real scientist and published by Oxford Uni Press. They are smarter than you, and if it were 1 + 1 = 3, OUP wouldn't have published it. Even if we disregard all this, the fact that you judged a book without reading it says a lot about your critical thinking skills.
- rng-concern 6mo agoI don't imagine that thinking, intelligent readers would pigeon-hole a very large group of people based off of one hn comment. Somewhat ironic.
- eager_learner 6mo agoActually, this 'very large group of people'--by definition [that they believe Evolution 'theory'] have pigeon-holed themselves as a certain type, hence their existence as a 'group'. I think the irony is that you didn't realize this.