4 ms·
You sure are giving them quite the benefit of the doubt. Why? https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/see-the-alleged-trump-birthday-note-to-epstein-released
by foltik 7mo ago
You sure are giving them quite the benefit of the doubt. Why?
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/see-the-alleged-trump-birthday-note-to-epstein-released-by-house-democrats https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/see-the-alleged-tr...
- gruez 7mo ago>https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/see-the-alleged-tr https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/see-the-alleged-tr... 1. "alleged" 2. I'm not sure what you're trying to refute. I specifically quoted a passage saying that they broke up in 2004, which implies they were together prior to that. 3. For the specific claim that Trump's a pedophile, a "drawing of a curvaceous woman" is hardly proof. At best it's a proof that he's a womanizer, but we hardly need proof of that given the "grab her by the pussy" quote.
- foltik 7mo ago[flagged]