4 ms·

alternative opinion: * it is possible to write high quality software using GenAI * not using GenAI could mean project won't be competitive in current landscap

• quantumHazer 7mo ago
  > not using GenAI could mean project won't be competitive in current landscape why? this is false in my opinion, iterating fast is not a good indicator of quality nor competitiveness
  • andriy_koval 7mo ago
    iterating fast over quality (e.g. refactoring, tests coverage, benchmarks, documentation, trying new nontrivial ideas) is a good indicator of quality.
    • quantumHazer 7mo ago
      you can’t iterate fast over quality though. it takes patience and expertise, not a bloated repo like this. every example you mentioned is not something you should delegate to LLMs, unless quick prototyping
      • andriy_koval 7mo ago
        > every example you mentioned is not something you should delegate to LLMs, unless quick prototyping it works very well for me, llm with guidance produces good quality code.
• Aurornis 7mo ago
  > * it is possible to write high quality software using GenAI From examine this codebase it doesn’t appear to be written carefully with AI. It looks like code that was promoted into existence as fast as possible.
  • andriy_koval 7mo ago
    sure, there are bad genAI projects and there are good genAI projects. You can remove genAI term from previous sentence.