2 ms·
After being caught developing nuclear weapons for real numerous times, now it is really for real?
by breppp 7mo ago
After being caught developing nuclear weapons for real numerous times, now it is really for real?
- pepperoni_pizza 7mo agoWere they caught by the same people who found WMDs in Iraq by any chance?
- breppp 7mo agothe IAEA, presumably you trust UN agencies? in any case, these are the mythical WMDs found in Iraq: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/12/03/world/middleeast/chemical-weapons-iraq-pentagon-secrets.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/12/03/world/middlee... https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/16/world/cia-is-said-to-have-bought-and-destroyed-iraqi-chemical-weapons.html https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/16/world/cia-is-said-to-have...
- 1659447091 7mo agoFrom your source: > "These weapons were not part of an active arsenal. They were remnants from Iraq’s arms program in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war." These are not the "WMD" that led to or had any involvement with 2003, it's dishonest to suggest so
- breppp 7mo agoThese were chemical weapons found in Iraq, the reason the new york times was interested in the story was the fact that ISIS has somehow developed chemical weapons using Iraq's existing infrastructure. This means there were active facilities, materials and know how even after the war
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- lm28469 7mo agoWe have Joe Kent on mic saying Iran was not building nukes and posed no threat to the US. The only people saying Iran was just about to get nukes are the Israelis, who've been saying that every 5 years for the last 40 years, and the only people who fell for it are magatards I don't understand how people fall for this shit after the Iraq war scam, which was essentially the exact same propaganda
- maratc 7mo agoWell, maybe you have a plausible explanation for why Iran needed 60%-grade enriched uranium -- now that we've firmly established that it clearly was not for building nukes.
- lm28469 7mo agoDo you have a plausible explanation why Saddam had anthrax ? Oh wait he didn't? Hmmm it really makes you think
- maratc 7mo agoAre you talking about the stuff he used to gas 100,000 Iranians in about 1984, or the stuff he used to gas 100,000 of his own citizens in 1988? Oh wait he didn't, it's all propaganda and war scam I guess.