4 ms·
You’re right, Anthropic is quite a bit worse https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/03/04/anthropic-ai-iran-campaign/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/tec
by Robdel12 7mo ago
You’re right, Anthropic is quite a bit worse https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/03/04/anthropic-ai-iran-campaign/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/03/04/anthrop...
- robbie-c 7mo agoWait - are you missing all the context on this? Anthropic pushed back against this hard, there was a whole back and forth. I'm on mobile and can't look it up for you atm but if you google about this scenario, Anthropic definitely come out of this looking a lot better than OpenAI and xAI
- Robdel12 7mo agoDid you read the article? Or are you just replying? Anthropic has literally been working with the DoD and Plantair for 2 years now. They were key to the Iran invasion. If thats “looking better”, keep it.
- theshrike79 7mo agoKey being “worked”, past tense Now they’re blacklisted from government work (appeal pending) and OpenAI practically jumped to replace them immediately
- Robdel12 7mo agoYou’re right it completely doesn’t matter they’ve been instrumental to ICE and the war in Iran. It’s fine now, their previous actions are excused. Edit: the word you’re also looking for is “working” not “worked”. I have many friends on government contracts still using Claude.