3 ms·
> "It's not that you refrain from doing something because it will offend Russia. If Russia is doing something that we don't want it to do, we should offend them
by wiseowise 7mo ago
> "It's not that you refrain from doing something because it will offend Russia. If Russia is doing something that we don't want it to do, we should offend them."[0]
Has Russia ever refrained from offending the West when it suited their interests?
> And should I mention the US "midwifing" the coup in Ukraine in 2014? [2]
It takes some really stupid arrogance to say shit like this when Ukraine literally had Russian stooge as a president at the time, installed via fossil fuel extortion. If Russia wanted truly neutral Ukraine, they should've backed the fuck off in the first place.
- drysine 7mo ago>Has Russia ever refrained from offending the West Of course. Like abstaining in a UN SC vote, allowing NATO bomb Libya. >Russian stooge as a president at the time, installed via fossil fuel extortion Nope, Yanukovich was elected by Ukrainian people.[0] Previous pro-Western president received only 6% of votes in the first round. >If Russia wanted truly neutral Ukraine, they should've backed the fuck off in the first place. Enlighten me, how backing off when the US supports pro-Western coup in the Ukraine would've resulted in "truly neutral Ukraine"? And please mind your language [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Ukrainian_presidential_election#Results https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Ukrainian_presidential_el...
- wiseowise 7mo ago> Of course. Like abstaining in a UN SC vote, allowing NATO bomb Libya. The generosity! > Nope, Yanukovich was elected by Ukrainian people.[0] Tell me more of those exciting stories. From your link: >> After all ballots were counted, the Ukrainian Central Election Commission declared that Yanukovych won the election with 48.95% of the vote compared with 45.47% for Tymoshenko. > Previous pro-Western president received only 6% of votes in the first round. After the guy was poisoned, disfigured beyond repair all while fighting smear campaigns calling him beekeeper. You should've linked [0] when you talk about Yushchenko, comrade. > Enlighten me, how backing off when the US supports pro-Western coup in the Ukraine would've resulted in "truly neutral Ukraine"? And please mind your language Quid pro quo, it's a really tough principle for Russian to understand, because they're only used to extortion. > And please mind your language Your attempt at patronizing is as pathetic as Russian military takeover of Ukraine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005%E2%80%932006_Russia%E2%80%93Ukraine_gas_dispute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005%E2%80%932006_Russia%E2%80...
- drysine 7mo ago>Ukrainian Central Election Commission declared that Yanukovych won the election with 48.95% of the vote compared with 45.47% for Tymoshenko Looks like typical American election. What's your point? >After the guy was poisoned After he was poisoned (by Ukrainians, btw), he was elected the president of the Ukraine. Fast forward 4 years and his approval ratings were 2-4% [0] >You should've linked [0] when you talk about Yushchenko, comrade. I fail to understand what point you are trying to make by referring to an article about Ukraine stealing Russian gas and getting caught. >Quid pro quo The US installs pro-Western government and then it becomes neutral because of what? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Ukrainian_presidential_election#Opinion_polls https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Ukrainian_presidential_el...