5 ms·
This feels a lot more lightweight than jQuery mobile while retaining the look/functionality needed to work on a mobile web app. Does this seem like a suitable r
by rcchen 14y ago
This feels a lot more lightweight than jQuery mobile while retaining the look/functionality needed to work on a mobile web app. Does this seem like a suitable replacement for jQM for a basic mobile web application?
- doctorpangloss 14y agoI don't think so. It doesn't support non-Webkit browsers, while jQM / SensaTouch and their friends do.