3 ms·
> It is FAR more important to raise that marketshare I don't see why. Most users of OSes couldn't care less about their OS. The vast majority of humans are hap
by palata 8mo ago
> It is FAR more important to raise that marketshare
I don't see why. Most users of OSes couldn't care less about their OS. The vast majority of humans are happy with Windows, macOS, iOS or Android. To the point where those who aren't are a rounding error.
I don't want to make Linux look like Windows, such that those people can finally use Linux and I can proudly look at a marketshare. If a Linux distro ever gets a "decent" marketshare, if won't be Linux: it will be a specific distro that managed to look like Windows or macOS. I most certainly won't be using that distro.
- jrm4 8mo agoeh, look up Richard Stallman et al. This isn't about "user preference," it's about preserving freedom in computing.
- antisol 7mo ago> I don't see why I'll take a stab at this, setting aside all the arguments I could make about software freedom, etc etc (and there's lots of those). Regardless of which distro you use or how into free software you are, there's a very simple truth: the more Linux users there are, the more people will develop software for Linux. More software supporting Linux == better. This applies both to proprietary software that people might want (e.g I'd kill for a Linux-native version of FL studio, the only thing I use wine for these days), and also for FLOSS software (more Linux users -> more exposure to FLOSS ideals -> more converts -> more FLOSS software). Having the ecosystem grow is a good thing.