3 ms·
That ossifies intellectual monocultures, though. (Or, heaven forbid, if someone has a financial conflict of interest in the private sphere...)
by vkou 7mo ago
That ossifies intellectual monocultures, though. (Or, heaven forbid, if someone has a financial conflict of interest in the private sphere...)
- DANmode 7mo agoThe current solution doesn’t resist capture by capital either, and indeed we’re already left with all of the things claimed - the worst of both worlds, really.
- fc417fc802 7mo agoBut this is already how the purse holders operate. A big group of experts get together and vote on which grant proposals within a given category to fund. I think it comes down to how the system is structured and how many players there are. The more difficult it is for a small cult to capture control of the funding (or access to instrumentation or awarding of degrees or whatever) for a given area the less likely you are to end up with a monoculture. Assuming the majority of the funding continues to come from governments then you have a centralized point of leverage that can shape the system. So it should be possible to impose constraints that result in a system that actively prevents monocultures from developing.