3 ms·
The article is meant to be useful for the community. There's no use of us manipulating anything as my intent was to share some tips that worked for me (and migh
by adebelov 14y ago
The article is meant to be useful for the community. There's no use of us manipulating anything as my intent was to share some tips that worked for me (and might work for someone else). It got republished on lifehacker.
I am open to constructive conversations and suggestions. If you have ideas about social hacking, then please share them.
- alanctgardner2 14y agoThe thing is, I don't think this post benefits the community, especially reposting the lifehacker version after the original was front page so recently. I'm not really into social hacking, personally it feels dishonest. I discussed this on the last thread; social hacking only works because you're working against the norm. If everyone adopted it, it wouldn't be effective. So you have to do things that are really outrageous, that most people won't do. The other downside is that social hacking doesn't usually create anything; if everyone was social hacking, nobody would have energy for constructive endeavours. The broader point of my first post was that I felt there might be some manipulation of the system to put this post on the front page. Unfortunately it's difficult to prove, but we could always say that I'm making baseless allegations for reasons of self-promotion. That certainly feels like social hacking
- adebelov 14y agoI appreciate your honest input. And I agree to an extent that social hacking (networking) is not everything, far from it. However, in building a company, it's a very useful skill to have. As far as appearing on front page, I am not sure how hn works, but I can guarantee you that I have no interest in manipulating upvotes, nor do I have time to do it. And overall, I am just trying to create useful content for the community.