4 ms·
> On the other hand, what kind of wimpy ambition do you have if it won't survive having kids? Do you have so little to spare? I don't know, it seems like paren
by tavavex 7mo ago
> On the other hand, what kind of wimpy ambition do you have if it won't survive having kids? Do you have so little to spare?
I don't know, it seems like parenthood asks for a lot to be given up. Younger people like myself are already struggling to live on their own where I am. There's not a lot that can be spared by most of us.
To me, having a child means heavily straining your financial safety - here, care for this other person that can't do anything and has some of the most expensive needs in society. Not only that, but you need to be sure that you can provide for the child for the next 5, 10, 15 years. Who has that sort of confidence? Then there's the part where all your free time is sacrificed to care for the child. The time burden decreases, but it's always a lot of time. And you always have to be extremely risk-averse - if you were just responsible for yourself before, now you have someone you need to take into account for every thing you do in life. Moves, job changes, major risks or investments, career changes, taking on additional responsibilities. All of these things probably become much less doable for parents. And this is a one-way road with no backing out, you commit to it and are stuck with that choice for several decades. By the time your child lives on their own, you've already spent a large portion of your adult life. And there's no guarantees that your child is someone you like, or that your parenthood isn't soured by something else. There's plenty of parents who are stuck in parenthood and hate it.
The thought of having a child scares me. I'm happy that the author is content with how his life turned out, but I'm okay with just watching from the sidelines. Maybe the biological instinct (forced coping mechanism?) is so strong as to justify living through the horrors above in exchange for watching your kids play and participating in similar things. But I don't want to learn what that's like.
- wltr 7mo agoIt’s like nobody knows who the author is, and that he’s rich. It’s different from when you’re not rich. (Not even saying poor.)
- tavavex 7mo agoI didn't realize who he was until I looked up the name. I'm just too young to have heard it from real life, and also I'm not great at names. I assumed he was someone known in the industry, but not literally the founder of Y Combinator.
- coneonthefloor 7mo agoYou exist solely to procreate. I could not imagine an emptier life, than one without children.
- strangegecko 7mo agoI reject your premise, but your conclusion is not surprising considering it. I couldn't imagine an emptier life than one where the only thing that matters is procreation. We're not Pacific Salmon.
- coneonthefloor 7mo agoI'm sorry for your loss.
- metalliqaz 7mo agoI think this is an unconsidered opinion. For example, I wonder how many monks or priests would agree with you.
- coneonthefloor 7mo agoMen that make sacrifices to serve.
- thunky 7mo agoYou're very confident in what you pull out of your butt.
- tavavex 7mo agoYou don't exist for something. You simply exist. What you choose to do with that existence is up to you. I've yet to see any evidence to the contrary.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- artyom 7mo ago
- vladgur 7mo agoThe best thing our(I’m in US) society can do to dispel fears like yours is to offer public daycare where kids are well cared for and socialized. I’m a child of Soviet Era and our parents did not think twice if they can afford children with their meager salaries. I remember going to a kindergarten as soon as I could walk. The reality is that a family can always make choices that enable them to care for a kid, but there are of course trade offs. Public daycare would mitigate one of those trade offs