3 ms·
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOSUS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOSUS Am I supposed to believe we live in a world where this exists, yet carriers are impossi
by torginus 7mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOSUS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOSUS
Am I supposed to believe we live in a world where this exists, yet carriers are impossible to find and track on the sea?
Besides, modern fighter jets have radars with 400km detection ranges against fighter sized targets.
A dozen of them or more specialized sensor aircraft could cover entire conflict zones.
- robotresearcher 7mo agoOf course it's possible to find a giant ship. The interesting parts are that this vector is crazy cheap using public APIs, and the irony of the location source being the voluntary-or-ignorant active telemetry from a US service person. It's possible to go to the moon, launch ICBMs, and make fusion bombs. It's news when something possible gets cheap and easy. It's also newsworthy when one of the most powerful and expensive weapon platforms in history doesn't have its infosec buttoned down.
- Legend2440 7mo ago>It's also newsworthy when one of the most powerful and expensive weapon platforms in history doesn't have its infosec buttoned down. Well, peace makes you sloppy. No one is at war with France right now, and no one is realistically going to attack this ship. If we were fighting WW3, you can bet sailors wouldn't be allowed to carry personal cellphones at all. Back in WW2, even soldier's letters back home had to be approved by the censors.
- astrobe_ 7mo agoInteresting point. On one hand they probably don't care if everyone knows where the carrier is (actually I'm pretty sure every military power knows where the other powers' military is), on the other hand from a "good practices" perspective, it doesn't look good. Would it just be virtue signaling, or is there more to it?