They stay locked in the science reporting bubble. The only real reason this was funded (IMO) is because it also has multi-faceted potential to increase arable l

They stay locked in the science reporting bubble. The only real reason this was funded (IMO) is because it also has multi-faceted potential to increase arable land, treat air and water pollution, create habitat for aquatic creatures, and improve farming output. Implementing it is a whole different ball game financially than a proof of concept though.