33 ms·

According to swissdevjobs.ch[1], the top 10% salary for a senior software developer in Switzerland is 135,000 swiss franc; that's roughly $170,000 per year. So

by mort96 7mo ago

According to swissdevjobs.ch[1], the top 10% salary for a senior software developer in Switzerland is 135,000 swiss franc; that's roughly $170,000 per year. So if this is correct, then even in Switzerland, it seems like $300,000 per year would be an obscenely high salary for a senior developer. [1]: https://swissdevjobs.ch/salaries/all/all/Senior https://swissdevjobs.ch/salaries/all/all/Senior

0x3f 7mo ago
Well first of all it's a CEO position, not an SWE :) Even if we scope it to SWE, I don't think that's far off the US percentiles. In London I imagine the top 10% SWE is not even 100k GBP. In Germany even worse.
- mort96 7mo ago
  I responded to the idea that $300,000/year is a "mid-to-high engineering salary". CEO salaries are absurdly high everywhere.
  - 0x3f 7mo ago
    Oh right, well it depends on CoL doesn't it? You can reframe European salaries as 'obscene' by world standards too. Both the US and Europe have totally broken and unaffordable housing markets, for example, but at least the Bay Area compensates with salary. I would say that relative to costs it's more that other salaries are obscenely low, if anything. People in Europe should be rioting, but unfortunately only the home owners are politically active.
    - mort96 7mo ago
      Does cities like San Francisco not have janitors? Waiters? Food delivery drivers? Or do those jobs command a six-figure salary too? If they can live comfortably in the city on a five-figure salary, maybe the argument that "cost of living is so high in SF that you can't live without a $300,000/year salary" is just a little bit overblown? I can not imagine what one could possibly need $300,000 per year for unless an apartment costs like $200,000 per year.
      - 0x3f 7mo ago
        You get by on a low salary by living with multiple people in the same apartment. Or you live far away and commute. Or both. Not really a tenable long-term situation for a senior employee with plans to start a family. Family homes of decent size and area are literally millions of dollars.
        mort96 7mo ago
        I guess I don't understand why programmers somehow deserve a better life than other people. Janitors deserve to start families too, don't they?
        0x3f 7mo ago
        It's not about deserving, programmers just have enough market power to be able to choose to go elsewhere. Janitors and other more fungible employees do not. Besides, I did already say that everyone else was underpaid relative to costs. But that's not unique to the Bay Area. Cost of housing relative to income is terrible in almost all of the major European cities too. Once cities become wealthy enough to develop a home owning class, they seem to cease being able to provision adequate housing supply in general.
        throw-the-towel 7mo ago
        Usually this kind of argument leads to punishing the programmers, not lifting up the janitors.
        mort96 7mo ago
        That's kind of two sides of the same coin, isn't it? The cost of living is so high in part because so many have ridiculously high salaries, isn't it?
        swiftcoder 7mo ago
        > The cost of living is so high in part because so many have ridiculously high salaries Bigger problem in the SF area is that a bunch of folks who owned property before the gold rush have ended up real-estate-rich, and formed a voting block that actively prevents the construction of new housing (on the basis that it might devalue their accidental real estate investment)
    - swiftcoder 7mo ago
      > Oh right, well it depends on CoL doesn't it? To some extent, maybe, but often not. For example, London has similar cost of living to the Bay Area, and when I was at Meta experienced folks like Dan Abramov over in London were making about the same as fresh college hires in Menlo Park...
      - 0x3f 7mo ago
        Yeah I was talking more about the definition of obscene. Like is it obscene to make 300k if housing is so expensive? I say no, and that London salaries are just bad. Although it would be preferable to fix the housing market. To be fair though, Dan specifically is kind of notorious for messing up his comp negotiation. Did you not see the Twitter pile on at the time?
        swiftcoder 7mo ago
        > Dan specifically is kind of notorious for messing up his comp negotiation Indeed, but having seen the infamous spreadsheet, he didn't have all that much headroom (unless he agreed to move to the US)

by mort96 7mo ago

0x3f 7mo ago

Well first of all it's a CEO position, not an SWE :) Even if we scope it to SWE, I don't think that's far off the US percentiles. In London I imagine the top 10% SWE is not even 100k GBP. In Germany even worse.

mort96 7mo ago
I responded to the idea that $300,000/year is a "mid-to-high engineering salary". CEO salaries are absurdly high everywhere.
- 0x3f 7mo ago
  Oh right, well it depends on CoL doesn't it? You can reframe European salaries as 'obscene' by world standards too. Both the US and Europe have totally broken and unaffordable housing markets, for example, but at least the Bay Area compensates with salary. I would say that relative to costs it's more that other salaries are obscenely low, if anything. People in Europe should be rioting, but unfortunately only the home owners are politically active.
  - mort96 7mo ago
    Does cities like San Francisco not have janitors? Waiters? Food delivery drivers? Or do those jobs command a six-figure salary too? If they can live comfortably in the city on a five-figure salary, maybe the argument that "cost of living is so high in SF that you can't live without a $300,000/year salary" is just a little bit overblown? I can not imagine what one could possibly need $300,000 per year for unless an apartment costs like $200,000 per year.
    - 0x3f 7mo ago
      You get by on a low salary by living with multiple people in the same apartment. Or you live far away and commute. Or both. Not really a tenable long-term situation for a senior employee with plans to start a family. Family homes of decent size and area are literally millions of dollars.
      - mort96 7mo ago
        I guess I don't understand why programmers somehow deserve a better life than other people. Janitors deserve to start families too, don't they?
        0x3f 7mo ago
        It's not about deserving, programmers just have enough market power to be able to choose to go elsewhere. Janitors and other more fungible employees do not. Besides, I did already say that everyone else was underpaid relative to costs. But that's not unique to the Bay Area. Cost of housing relative to income is terrible in almost all of the major European cities too. Once cities become wealthy enough to develop a home owning class, they seem to cease being able to provision adequate housing supply in general.
        throw-the-towel 7mo ago
        Usually this kind of argument leads to punishing the programmers, not lifting up the janitors.
        mort96 7mo ago
        That's kind of two sides of the same coin, isn't it? The cost of living is so high in part because so many have ridiculously high salaries, isn't it?
        swiftcoder 7mo ago
        > The cost of living is so high in part because so many have ridiculously high salaries Bigger problem in the SF area is that a bunch of folks who owned property before the gold rush have ended up real-estate-rich, and formed a voting block that actively prevents the construction of new housing (on the basis that it might devalue their accidental real estate investment)
  - swiftcoder 7mo ago
    > Oh right, well it depends on CoL doesn't it? To some extent, maybe, but often not. For example, London has similar cost of living to the Bay Area, and when I was at Meta experienced folks like Dan Abramov over in London were making about the same as fresh college hires in Menlo Park...
    - 0x3f 7mo ago
      Yeah I was talking more about the definition of obscene. Like is it obscene to make 300k if housing is so expensive? I say no, and that London salaries are just bad. Although it would be preferable to fix the housing market. To be fair though, Dan specifically is kind of notorious for messing up his comp negotiation. Did you not see the Twitter pile on at the time?
      - swiftcoder 7mo ago
        > Dan specifically is kind of notorious for messing up his comp negotiation Indeed, but having seen the infamous spreadsheet, he didn't have all that much headroom (unless he agreed to move to the US)