3 ms·

> including competing products like OpenCode I think that’s a bit more nuanced. The actual „product” is not the harness, which is free anyway, but the Claude s

by exitb 7mo ago

> including competing products like OpenCode I think that’s a bit more nuanced. The actual „product” is not the harness, which is free anyway, but the Claude subscription. In any scenario, that’s what the customer continues to pay for. I understand why Anthropic is doing that, but I feel no need to defend it. Just like I understand why Apple limits your app choices to AppStore, but I’m not going to go out of my way to defend their decision.

ffsm8 7mo ago
It's way more nuanced, because the subscription is older then Claude Code - and they only started to have a problem with third parties using it after Claude Code. (And not with the release, just some time after the release)
- dns_snek 7mo ago
  That makes perfect sense because that's when it became orders of magnitude more expensive to offer the service.
  - ffsm8 7mo ago
    To me, that argument would only make sense if the subscription wasn't metered... But it is.
gausswho 7mo ago
Sheriff spits to the ground. One harness. One horse. How we do it' fer now on.