6 ms·
I get it, I know how rounding works. I mean, its basically 100k - why not just say that? That would be justifiable too, right? What would you have done, in t
by verisimi 7mo ago
I get it, I know how rounding works. I mean, its basically 100k - why not just say that? That would be justifiable too, right?
What would you have done, in those circumstances though? Would you 'round up', overstating your case, like Anthropic did? Or would you ensure that you avoid the suggestion that you were misrepresenting the numbers?
- cpburns2009 7mo agoI'd round it to 81k whether the number is good or bad. It's less than a 1% difference. What I wouldn't do is round it to 100k because that's a 24% increase, unless the number was really inconsequential. Say you have a website with 10m requests over a month, 9.9m were successful, and "100k" were failed requests for nonsense pages.
- verisimi 7mo agoThanks for your thoughts. You would round up 99k to 100k (fair, imo) but don't round down 80.5k to 80k? I guess this is just one of those things...