2 ms·
I live in a city. Like a large number of Americans, I had one broadband provider available for 20 years. (Something like 75% of us have 1 or 2). The price was
by mattmaroon 7mo ago
I live in a city. Like a large number of Americans, I had one broadband provider available for 20 years. (Something like 75% of us have 1 or 2).
The price was high and the service was bad. I struggled to reliably achieve 20mbs at $80/mo.
Starlink is better than that, and it’s millions of people. 5g home internet is slow to spread here too.
Their market is large.
- infinitewars 7mo agoYes and unless you're paying Starlink say $300/mo, they are taking a loss to serve you internet. Cities are especially difficult for them because more users are in the same spot beam so everyone shares the spectrum and they need even lower oversubscription ratios.
- mattmaroon 7mo agoYeah I don't know about the math. I've seen numbers that differ significantly from yours, but none which make it profitable at a reasonable price. I am sure he will continue to drop launch costs and I assume satellite improvements will make them able to serve more people, maybe orbit longer as they get smaller. Or maybe it'll just implode. I hope not.
- infinitewars 7mo agoThat math doesn't need to mask sense, it's always been about Golden Dome.
- panick21_ 7mo agoComplete nonsense. They didn't start in 2015 and didn't get investment into Starlink from Google because hopefully some presidnet would want Goldon Dome in the future. Starlink is a good business and has plenty of military value without Goldon Dome.