4 ms·
I think the worst case is actually that the LLM faithfully implements your spec, but your spec was flawed. To the extent that you outsource the mechanical detai
by et1337 7mo ago
I think the worst case is actually that the LLM faithfully implements your spec, but your spec was flawed. To the extent that you outsource the mechanical details to a machine trained to do exactly what you tell it, you destroy or at least hamper the feedback loop between fuzzy human thoughts and cold hard facts.
- agentultra 7mo agoUnfortunately even formal specifications have this problem. Nothing can replace thinking. But sycophancy, I agree, is a problem. These tools are designed to be pleasing, to generate plausible output; but they cannot think critically about the tasks they're given. Nothing will save you from a bad specification. And there's no royal road to knowing how to write good ones.
- et1337 7mo agoRight, there’s no silver bullet. I think all I can do is increase the feedback bandwidth between my brain and the real world. Regular old stuff like linters, static typing, borrow checkers, e2e tests… all the way to “talking to customers more”