3 ms·
Same here. I’ve adopted uv across all of my Python projects and couldn’t be happier. ty looks very promising as well. Probably inevitable, and I don’t blame th
by alex_suzuki 7mo ago
Same here. I’ve adopted uv across all of my Python projects and couldn’t be happier. ty looks very promising as well.
Probably inevitable, and I don’t blame the team, I just wish it were someone else.
- ragebol 7mo agoTy, Ruff, UV, all great tools I recently started really using and I couldn't be happier with them. Sigh
- pprotas 7mo agoMonkey paw curls tight Microsoft acquires Astral Wish comes with a cost
- BoorishBears 7mo agoThat'd be fine, MS is a blue-chip I'm not worried about OpenAI messing up uv, I'm worried about OpenAI running out of money and cutting an unnecessary team.
- saalweachter 7mo agoI kind of feel like the nature of the Python ecosystem is a dozen or so extremely useful frameworks/tools that everyone uses heavily for 3 years and then abandons and never speaks of again. I'm not very deep in Python anymore, but every time I dip my toes back in it's a completely different set of tools, with some noticably rare exceptions (eg, numpy).
- fastasucan 7mo agoI cant see how the ecosystem evolves being a bad thing?
- jitl 7mo agoi think most of the previous package management tools have been like 70% solutions - for 70% of things, they're much better than previous tools, but then 30% of the problem goes unaddressed. For example, poetry does a good job at managing your package, but decided not to manage python versions. So, I still need some other bootstrap process involving a huge pile of bash. uv feels like the first 100% coverage solution i've seen in the python space, and it also has great developer experience. I can't speak to the rest of the ecosystem, when I write python it's extremely boring and I'm still using Flask same as i was in 2016.