3 ms·
As you can see by downvotes and comments, they still don't get it. LLMs make developers more efficient. That much is obvious to anyone who isn't blinded by fea
by jappgar 7mo ago
As you can see by downvotes and comments, they still don't get it.
LLMs make developers more efficient. That much is obvious to anyone who isn't blinded by fear.
But people will respond "but you still need developers!" True. You don't need nearly as many, though. In fact, with an LLM in their hands, the poor performers are more of a liability than ever. They'll be let go first.
But even the "smart" developers will be subsumed, as vastly more efficient companies outcompete the ones where they work.
Companies with slop-tolerant architectures will take over every industry. They'll have humans working there. But not many.
- bigfishrunning 7mo ago> LLMs make developers more efficient. They do not. I review a ton of code, and while the quantity is going up, the quality of that code is getting worse. LLMs only make developers more efficient if they skip the due-diligence required to verify its output; they all say they don't, and almost all of them do.
- itsfine2 7mo agoProbably it's not a perston you're answering to, so there no point to try to have a reasonable conversation.