3 ms·
Sure I use LLMs in my workflows. I use a calculator too. I can divide 98,324,672,722 by 161,024 by hand. At least I used to be able to do, but nobody is going
by iso1631 7mo ago
Sure I use LLMs in my workflows. I use a calculator too.
I can divide 98,324,672,722 by 161,024 by hand. At least I used to be able to do, but nobody is going to pay me to do that when a calculator exists.
Likewise I can write a bunch of assembly (well OK I can't), but why would I do that when my compiler can convert my intention into it.
- causalityltd 7mo agoyeah but will you promise to do it by hand and then use a calculator? Or will you have every intention to keep the promise but it would seem such a chore by now (cuz calculator is such a part of your workflow) that you would minimize the sanctity of your promise in your mind? If yes, that's dependency, not usual use. (I just learned that choosing no-LLM also meant no-LLM on their own papers, so I am less generous with motivations now. Wasn't dependency, just plain old self-interest. Thanks for your point.)