3 ms·
Can we go back to making all this garbage, I don’t know, a browser extension or something? All of this crap that everyone keeps pulling into their browsers nee
by kotaKat 7mo ago
Can we go back to making all this garbage, I don’t know, a browser extension or something?
All of this crap that everyone keeps pulling into their browsers needs to be ripped back out and made a plugin or an extension. Stop shoving it in the core damn browser. I didn’t need the waste of space and I’m never going to touch it.
- philipallstar 7mo agoWhy would a VPN be a good browser extension?
- kotaKat 7mo agoWhy does the VPN need to be integrated into the browser itself?
- philipallstar 7mo agoI don't think it should. You think it should be a browser extension. I don't think it should either be integrated or a browser extension.
- fortyseven 7mo agoI think we can interpret "browser extension" as a catch-all for "not directly built into the browser", in whatever form that takes.
- kotaKat 7mo agoQuite frankly I don't think it should be either. I'm sick of browsers trying to sidestep my operating system's networking stack (be it forcing their own DNS implementations for 'security' or now this BS).
- ranger_danger 7mo agoThere are other usecases that don't affect you which are very handy for others, such as testing site access from different countries with per-tab geo settings from a VPN extension.
- lukan 7mo agoConvenience. I also don't mind it in the browser as it would not really add much complexity. Some lines of code at most? VPN's do not require complex client logic - they require actual servers that reroute the user traffic - that is the expensive part. And for many non technical users that is very useful, if they can get that with a click. To get geoblocked content, etc. Mozilla has done way worse things, much more distracting from their core mission - building a browser that people want to use and trust.
- lxgr 7mo agoThe core new functionality here seems to be MASQUE proxy support, which is genuinely useful and probably not possible to provide in a plugin. Of course the UI itself could be extracted into a plugin, but I'm not really a fan of the pattern of shipping a large feature and extract only the thin UI layer into a plugin. It felt very weird when Mozilla tried it with "multi-user containers".