4 ms·
Surely you see it's somewhat unreasonable? As if it was written by the author you disliked, and until you knew of the fact, you quite enjoyed it. Quite honestl
by abeindoria 7mo ago
Surely you see it's somewhat unreasonable? As if it was written by the author you disliked, and until you knew of the fact, you quite enjoyed it.
Quite honestly, I do that sometimes too -- but I _know_ that it's unreasonable.
- y0eswddl 7mo agohard to form an emotional connection with the emotionless
- abeindoria 7mo agoEh, People form emotional connections with inanimate objects, so I'm unsure if that's a good enough argument tbf.
- zarzavat 7mo agoA djungelskog is not a threat. AI threatens my livelihood and my humanity. The worst part is I have to use it regardless because I would be uncompetitive without it.
- idiotsecant 7mo agoSays parent post, while thinking a stack of rocks that looks a little like a fat raccoon is kind of cute. Humans are designed to form emotional connections with non emotional things. Its sort of our whole deal.
- cluckindan 7mo agoHumans are definitely not designed.
- y0eswddl 6mo agoYes, but, that goes away when the "thing" is meant to mimic/replace/replicate a human... that's why "uncanny valley" is just a gut-level unsettling feeling. The lack of emotional nuance.
- _dwt 7mo agoFor me, “interestingly wrong” becomes just “wrong” without human thinking behind it. I wasn’t bowled over by the prose, I just thought it was an uncommon take and didn’t twig the signs it was Claude product.
- vincnetas 7mo agoCan i compare this with fucking inflatable doll (not done this, just extrapolating). Even if senses for your penis are identical, whole experience is totally not the same as doing with another live person.