3 ms·
You mean throw those billions, tens of thousands of man hours, shareholder attenton, industry power and mindshare to a mostly useless concept, just because he h
by poisonborz 7mo ago
You mean throw those billions, tens of thousands of man hours, shareholder attenton, industry power and mindshare to a mostly useless concept, just because he had the money? Why are those resources not better spent on 100+ startups and 100+ unique ideas that are immediately tested by the market?
- georgeburdell 7mo agoJust because the end concept was useless doesn’t mean the individual pieces don’t have value. Meta’s loose wallet probably kickstarted the work of dozens of smaller companies in the hardware space whose work can be parlayed into other areas.
- drivebyhooting 7mo agoIt was not very efficient usage of the money. It actually ended up paying for overpriced real estate in the bay area and vanity toys such as Porsches.
- georgeburdell 7mo agoConsidering other mega corps would either hoard the cash or increase dividends, the fact that any money went to engineers is a win. Saying the money would be better spent funding startups does not reflect any real possibility.
- lostmsu 7mo agoThat would be useful if they open sourced the effort. Otherwise it will die of total irrelevance 15-30 years from now.
- WillPostForFood 7mo agoFacebook's mismanagement of VR financed and launched Anduril.
- dgellow 7mo agoMeta has more than enough money to do all of that at the same time
- edmundsauto 7mo agoIf you look around at the startup scene the past 5-10 years, has it really been any better?