3 ms·
I think this theory deserves its own blog post, with a bit more detail. I am not sure I follow the unpayable debt -> civil unrest step of the argument. I thin
by javert 14y ago
I think this theory deserves its own blog post, with a bit more detail.
I am not sure I follow the unpayable debt -> civil unrest step of the argument.
I think the overall theory is probably a stretch, but I think you're really onto something.
For one thing, the creation of massive federal police a la DHS and TSA is extremely scary to me, and something people should be paying more attention to.
For example, hypothetically, what would signifiy the "tipping point" where those with means to do so, should flee the country? Probably the elimintation of free speech, but what if it's too late by then? Take note that "liberals" are already demanding the beginning of the end of free speech under the guise of "campaign finance reform."
Another thing people should be paying more attention to is figuring out the effect of the debt spiral and continual inflation (presumably quantitative easing will continue indefinitely). At what point should I convert all USD holdings to other things? And should those other things include, say, domestic real estate, or should they be only gold (and bitcoin :) )? The answer to that would depend on the earlier "tipping point" thing.
To those who think this is all a meaningless rant: Protection of individual rights (the Constitution) has been eroding for centuries, which is reaching its culmination, and the US is reapidly becoming a police state. Wake up.
- bluedanieru 14y agoCampaign finance reform has nothing to do with freedom of speech. Way to derail your own post
- natrius 14y agoThe Supreme Court of the United States disagrees with you.
- clebio 14y agoIs the crux of that argument that sourcing the funding would put at risk people who might support a candidate's causes, but whose safety might be compromised by identification? It is an honest question; I haven't followed that case closely. So, for example, someone living in the rural south that wants to back gay rights, or something of the sort? That would tie back to the entire Google+ real-names debate, then.
- riffic 14y agoLessig would fault your hit on "campaign finance reform".