4 ms·
Most (or at least many) people visually recognize 24 fps content as film and higher frame rate content as TV/video. Filmmakers generally like their films to lo
by toast0 8mo ago
Most (or at least many) people visually recognize 24 fps content as film and higher frame rate content as TV/video.
Filmmakers generally like their films to look like film and high frame rate films are rare and get mixed reviews.
Some TV shows are recorded and presented in 24 fps to appear more cinematic (Stargate: SG1 is an example)
- cubefox 8mo agoThat association seems to be an unfortunate equilibrium because higher frame rates seem to be "objectively" better, similar to higher resolution and color. (Someone without prior experience with TV/movies would presumably always prefer a version with higher frame rate.)
- account42 8mo agoIn general yes. Low framerates can be used deliberately to make something feel more dreamlike but that is something that should only used in very specific cases.
- neckro23 8mo agoPretty much all dramatic American TV shows were shot on film (at 24 fps) before the digital camera era. It's why so many old shows (ex. Star Trek TNG) are now available as HD remasters, they simply go back and rescan the film. It's more complicated in other countries (the BBC liked to shoot on video a lot) but it was standard practice in the States.
- account42 8mo agoIt took far more than simply rescanning the film to get the TNG remasters as all the visual effects were only rendered and composed at broadcast resolutions (and framerates). They had to essentially recreate all of that, which is why we haven't gotten the same remasters for the less popular Deep Space Nine and Voyager series. From what I have see most series of that era were edited in NTSC after converting the original film material.