3 ms·
It is not. Why is that relevant to social entities?
by lnenad 7mo ago
It is not. Why is that relevant to social entities?
- lvoudour 7mo agoHow well you interact with other members of a society increases your chances of procreation, survival, knowledge acquisition, ie. it makes sense as a measure of intelligence
- LogicFailsMe 7mo agoIt's a pretty ambiguous definition. The most powerful man in the world right now is not someone I consider a role model for social cognition and yet there he is with the football for the second time demonstrating grandmaster skill at social cognition to get there.
- lvoudour 7mo agoYou don't have to be empathetic and nice, just good at navigating society.
- LogicFailsMe 7mo agoSo in all seriousness with a bit of snark: Do you want a malevolent AGI? Because "good at navigating society" as the only benchmark here is how you get a malevolent AGI... Evidence: cuckoos and cheaters all the way down the evolutionary ladder as a winning strategy and arms race against the hard workers.
- lvoudour 7mo agoI don't like a$$holes but they do exist and they are part of our species, ergo intelligent. My opinion of them doesn't change the fact
- LogicFailsMe 7mo agoYes, but we have a choice about whether the AGI is an a$$h0l3 or not. That's the difference here. You do see that right?
- lnenad 7mo agoI agree 100%.