3 ms·
OpenAI needs to focus on how Claude is leaving them in the dust for LLM assisted coding.
by wewewedxfgdf 7mo ago
OpenAI needs to focus on how Claude is leaving them in the dust for LLM assisted coding.
- TranquilMarmot 7mo ago.... did you read the post? Half of it is about this
- briHass 7mo agoAre they? I'd put Codex 5.3 on par with CC for almost every task, and OAI has been rapidly updating their app, with a major initial release for Windows just a few weeks ago. Quotas are a moving target, but right now, Codex offers a better value by far, being very usable at the $20 level. I don't have a dog in this race other than competition keeping them all honest. Claude led for so long, but I think that early lead has blinded many to how close it is now. The only one really eating dust is Google. What a terrible offering. I wish it wasn't so, because they could really apply some price pressure to the competition with their scale and integration.
- orphea 7mo agoI've been using 5.3-Codex. I cannot proof because it's subjective, but I have better results (you could say more reasonable) with it than 4.6 Opus. GPT-5.4 one-shot a cross-language issue (a C++ repo + some amount of Lua), Opus kept hallutinating. This was debugging, not codegen.