3 ms·
I do 100% disagree. web apps are gated by the abominations of whatng cartel web engines, with even worse SDKs, mechanically certainly not 'small' and assurely
by sylware 7mo ago
I do 100% disagree.
web apps are gated by the abominations of whatng cartel web engines, with even worse SDKs, mechanically certainly not 'small' and assurely a definitive nono.
And the 'old' interface, you bet I tried to use it... which is actually gated with javascript... so...
- marginalia_nu 7mo agoI assume you're blocked by the new bot blocker? I've tested it in both w3m and dillo, should work fine as long as your browser renders noscript tags. It's very much designed from the ground up to handle browsers like that. Just requires you to manually wait a few seconds and then press the link. One configuration that might break is if you're running something like chrome or firefox, and rigging it to not run JS. But it's really hard to support those types of configurations. If it works in w3m, it's no longer a "site requires JS" issue...
- sylware 7mo agoI have tested many times. Some while ago. I used lynx and links2 (not yet netsurf), as far as I can recall, never got what you talked about. Was brutally blocked and got the finger because none of those web browsers has javascript (and even CSS). While thinking about it, I hate even more the whatng cartel for the damage they did to the web with their 'web apps'.
- marginalia_nu 7mo agoI don't know what to say. Here's a video of me getting past the bot blocker with links2 I guess? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19-nXUYe9cA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19-nXUYe9cA
- sylware 7mo agowt... never got that. Did I have parasites on my line?? I did re-test just now, I get the same thing than in the vid. meh.
- rodarima 7mo agoThanks a lot for considering no-JS browser like Dillo, in the current web hellscape is certainly a difficult task. I checked and it works well in Dillo on my end.