> Really good article! There's too many designers calling their work responsive when they only work on desktop and a couple of Apple devices. It's good. Perhap

> Really good article! There's too many designers calling their work responsive when they only work on desktop and a couple of Apple devices. It's good. Perhaps the inclination to tag "really good" is because of the trendy pictures? But really, Simon's article/presentation/rant is presented as responsive design within a framework that is mobile-first. And the body of his works shows a distinctly mobile-first perspective. Which is not bad, but is also not necessarily responsive. Really good responsive design gives an optimized desktop experience, and gracefully degrades to smaller screens. --OR-- Really good responsive design gives an optimized mobile experience, and gracefully expands for larger screens.