3 ms·
DCLS actually makes sense for this scenario as the fault tolerance gained from having three processors isn't needed here. The system can halt when there's a mis
by mysteria 7mo ago
DCLS actually makes sense for this scenario as the fault tolerance gained from having three processors isn't needed here. The system can halt when there's a mismatch, it doesn't have to perform a vote and continue running if 2 of 3 are getting the same result.
Also I just thought of this but it should be possible to design a chip where the second processor runs a couple cycles behind the first one, with all the inputs and outputs stashed in fifos. This would basically make any power glitches affect the two CPUs differently and any disrepancies would be easily detected.
- genewitch 7mo agoyeah give the man more ideas, smart
- saagarjha 7mo agoYou could glitch both processors?
- mike_hearn 7mo agoI think the idea is they both hang off the same voltage rail.